O. Hood Phillips and Jackson’s constitutional and administrative law, 8th ed
O. Hood Phillips and Jackson’s constitutional and administrative law, 8th ed
Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland > England and Wales > General works
Edition Details
- Language: English
- Jurisdiction(s): England
- Publication Information: London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2001
- Publication Type (Medium): Trials, litigation, etc, Cases
- Type: Book
- Other titles: Constitutional and administrative law.
- Permalink: https://books.lawi.org.uk/o-hood-phillips-and-jackson-s-constitutional-and-administrative-law-8th-ed/ (Stable identifier)
Short Description
cxxvi, 855 pages ; 24 cm
Purpose and Intended Audience
Useful for students learning an area of law, O. Hood Phillips and Jackson’s constitutional and administrative law, 8th ed is also useful for lawyers seeking to apply the law to issues arising in practice.
Research References
- Providing references to further research sources: Search
More Options
- Find it at other libraries via WorldCat/OCLC
- Find O. Hood Phillips and Jackson’s constitutional and administrative law, 8th ed in Google Books
- Find O. Hood Phillips and Jackson’s constitutional and administrative law, 8th ed in Open Library
Bibliographic information
- Responsable Person: edited by Paul Jackson and Patricia Leopold.
- Publication Date: 2001
- Country/State: England
- Number of Editions: 1 editions
- First edition Date: 2001
- Last edition Date: 2001
- General Notes: Includes index.
- Languages: British English
- Library of Congress Code: KD3930
- ISBN: 0421574801 9780421574809
- OCLC: 263622654
Main Contents
Part I: The nature of constitutional and administrative law. Part II: Parliament. Part III: The central government. Part IV: Justice and police. Part VI: Administrative law. Part VII: The Commonwealth.
Summary Note
This edition covers the many significant developments that have occurred since publication of the previous edition. These include the increased impact of Community Law, the revival of interest in “habeous corpus” as an alternative to judicial review, and the Scott Report and civil service changes. ”’
Leave a Reply