Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism
Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism
Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland > England and Wales > KD3989
Edition Details
- Creator or Attribution (Responsibility): T. R. S. Allan
- Language: English
- Jurisdiction(s): England
- Publication Information: Oxford [England] : Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press, 1993
- Material: Internet resource
- Type: Book, Internet Resource
- Permalink: https://books.lawi.org.uk/law-liberty-and-justice-the-legal-foundations-of-british-constitutionalism/ (Stable identifier)
Additional Format
Online version: Allan, T.R.S. (Trevor R.S.). Law, liberty, and justice. Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1993 (OCoLC)624463053
Short Description
XXII, 294 pages ; 24 cm
Purpose and Intended Audience
Useful for students learning an area of law, Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism is also useful for lawyers seeking to apply the law to issues arising in practice.
Research References
- Providing references to further research sources: Search
More Options
- Find it at other libraries via WorldCat/OCLC
- Find Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism in Google Books
- Find Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism in Open Library
Bibliographic information
- Publishers: Clarendon Press – Oxford University Press
- Responsable Person: T.R.S. Allan.
- Publication Date: 1993
- Country/State: England
- Number of Editions: 19 editions
- First edition Date: 1993
- Last edition Date: 2003
- Languages: British English
- Library of Congress Code: KD3989
- Dewey Code: 342.41
- ISBN: 0198252536 9780198252535
- OCLC: 27430456
Publisher Description:
In a fresh appraisal of the fundamental doctrines of constitutional law, Trevor Allan examines the nature of the rule of law and the separation of powers. He refutes the traditional doctrine of unlimited parliamentary sovereignty, challenges the orthodox distinction between law and convention,
and considers the character of common law rights and the nature and purpose of judicial review of administrative action.
Leave a Reply